Why didn't Nintendo make more realistic, violent games for the Wii just to prove 3rd parties wrong?

[oniyide]

Jay520 said:

creampie said:
1.) they dont believe in realistic violent games, they put more enfasis in the fun factor and gameplay mechanics, they try to cater to a wider audience...
2.) also we could ask why Sony or Microsoft havent made any action rpg, plataformer adventure, arcade racer, FP adventure, RTS...etc. to prove themselves?
3.) Also if you are suggesting that core games are the realistic looking or violent themed or M rated ones, then you have no idea what you are talking about...

1.) So Nintendo would miss out on potentially bringing third-party games to their hardware, and satisfying their userbase, because of what they 'believe' in.

2.) Sony & Microsoft aren't the ones that desperately need third-party support.

3.) If you don't like that definition of 'core', then talk to 3rd parties, not me.

Not to mention that MS and Sony have made some of those genres he mentioned. Modnation, LBP, R&C, Jumping Flash way back in the day,