Millenium said:
Mummelmann said:
Capulous said:
Nem said:
Here we go again.
If PSN was what was breaking the bank accont they would've have started charging long ago. Seriously, stop believing the crap microsoft feeds you to rape your wallet. Microsoft doesnt want PSN to be free because that gives SONY an advantage over them, and their too greedy to make it free.
Do you see anyone else charging for the use of their online network? Does nintendo do it? steam? blizzard? anyone? No. Dont you think that is a mighty coincidence? Seriously, stop beeing manipulated by microsoft and its payroll analysts...
|
I am actually curious on how you came up with this stuff. What exactly is MS feeding people about LIVE to rape our wallets? How are they manipulating us? If these companies are not here to make money, exactly what are they here for?
|
MS have always implied that in order to offer a good quality online service, it needs to cost money. This is simply not so, Steam is the perfect example.
|
I wouldn't say that's entirely accurate... All services cost money, the key is who pays that money.
Now I can't testify to the accuracy of it, but there was a report in 2009 that said publishers had to pay up to ~16 cents per Gigabyte of their content that was downloaded on PSN, so obviously it has cost, difference is who pays that cost.
|
For end user. Steam does not cost money for the end user (besides purchases, obviously). Of course someone has to pay it, I know that its not for free... 
