Jay520 on 09 June 2012
| Kresnik said: I don't really understand the moderation rules here to be honest, because I haven't seen any kind of consistency with them - I assume that's just because there's multiple moderators who use different amounts of discretion. Example I'd use kind of links back to Carl2291's point about the way people say things just to get a rise out of people. Kantor wrote "Do not create threads, posts or signatures just to bait a certain group of people". That's fine, I get that - Using Turkish's example, that picture was just to get a reaction out of Xbox fans, so he got banned for it. But something like this: Which is a more subtle way of trolling, just gets locked and that's it? I mean, please tell me he at least got a warning for it because it's exactly the same premise as Turkish's ban. But anyway, Kantor trolled too, I think he should ban himself! It's good because I'm more excited about Sly Cooper and LittleBigPlanet than I could ever be able FableKinect and Halo >=( |
I don't think that thread was bad. The OP was just saying that the PS3's holiday lineup was weak, but was just asking for some clarification. Also, the user didn't have a history of trolling, so he probably just received a warning.
OT: I don't think we should be banned for calling people trolls. If they have a history of trolling, then they are trolls. I only think one should get in trouble if they can't provide substantial evidence to prove their claims.
