| ToraReaper said: No armor lock would save me from of a lot of raging, nothing worse than showing a sticky and having it bounce back onto you or going to run over someone with a ghost and having them go into lock causing it to explode and die. |
i think having a ghost and driving over people without armor locks isn't very fair neither. if you get killed by people with armor lock, don't drive over them anymore. you can test them, first you act like you want to drive above him and if he doesn't use armor lock he shouldn't have it and if he uses it, you know it and you are still alive. there is always a way to see if someone has it or not. if you drive over everyone without testing them out it's your own fault to die then. you just want to get rid of something you don't know how to act against. you just want to have enemies without the chance to compete against you if they don't have a plasma or rocket.
that's why i think armor lock is a great invention knowing most hate it (better would be none of the abilities in my opinion) because they aren't really a problem if you play against them but most are so bad to wait 1 meter away if they use it and wonder then that they lose their shield when armor lock is over. or like you, they drive over everyone wondering that one out of of four or so can use armor lock lol
if you want to see it like you, everything is unfair. isn't it unfair if someone has jetpack? he can fly, throw grenades at you and shoot at you and you can't trrow grenades at him, you only can shoot at him. it's a huge advantage for him then. his exploding grenade will hit you and he needs less shots as you need then.
or isn't it unfair if you search for an enemy and then you get a headshot by someone 50 meters away waiting for enemies with invisible armor? you couldn't see him, there is no way you can do something against it if you aren't close enough to see the radar going crazy.
i would love to see halo without all of that but that won't happen anymore.
