axumblade said:
milkyjoe said:
kitler53 said:
i (and the other ~120M households that already own a ps3 or 360) won't be enticed by any of those titles. why the hell would i get new hardware to play the same game i already can buy for the hardware i own?? with dragon quest X already out of wii, i don't see that being an enticing title either.
of what's left a few (like sing) look terrible but in short what i see is only titles for the "casuals". Wii Fit, NSMB, Just Dance, Nintendo Land. Pikmin, zombieU, rayman will probably all be good games but i dout any of them are real big or system sellers.
wii U won't be any where near the kind of flop the virtual boy was but i just can't see it doing anywhere near what the wii did either. So what did the ps3 and 360 do in their first years? I see the wiiU having a similar launch.
|
You need to learn to not talk in such absolutes. I am a PS3 owner. I already own Arkham City on PS3. I am going to buy the Armoured Edition of Arkham City on Wii U.
According to your absolute, I should not be doing that. But I will be.
|
But in all fairness, are you buying a Wii to specifically play the Armored Edition of Arkham city....or are you buying a WiiU and buying the Armored Edition of Arkham City?
It's a ginuine question, because I see things from the perspective of "Why would I buy a new system just to play Batman: Arkham City when I have it on the PS3?" I feel that it's the same reason some people who own an xbox 360 don't buy a PS3 and vise versa. It's a lot of cool features but is it worth the price of a new console to play the game that way?
|
to add ...
it a huge part of why the vita is floundering. why get a vita to play games when a majority of them are console ports?
