To me, I'm very conflicted because on one hand I think this generation has physically more games for me to play, but that's only due to the fact that this generation is much longer than the last. The PS2 launched in 2000 and all the 7th gen consoles launched by 2006. Fast forward and here we are, the Xbox 360 having launched in 2005, and we're waiting for Wii U to start the next gen in 2012, so I think the PS3, Xbox 360 and Wii have had an unfair advantage in that regard.
On the other hand, I don't really like where this games industry is heading today. We have games that need patching at launch, then they need patches to fix bugs in that patch, and so on and so on. See Skyrim. Then we have day one DLC that could've easily been put on the disc, but publishers purposefully took it out so they could sell it back to us for a quick buck. Not to mention that there have been far fewer new IPs this generation. Bioshock, Portal, Gears of War, and No More Heroes are the only ones that stand out to me, whereas the 6th gen has Call of Duty, Halo, Manhunt, Pikmin, Medal of Honor, Monster Hunter, Kingdom Hearts, Guitar Hero, Eternal Darkness, God of War, Team Ico's games, and Soul Calibur (on the Dreamcast-technically 6th gen too). And that's just off the top of my head.
So I guess to answer the question, I think the 7th gen has more in terms of raw number of games I play, but I'd prefer the 6th gen just for its creativity and lack of developers screwing us over.
Babble babble bitch bitch rebel rebel party party sex sex sex and don't forget the violence. Blah blah blah got your lovey-dovey sad and lonely stick your stupid slogan in. Everybody sing along.
