By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
o_O.Q said:
SaviorX said:

Ok, I've heard a lot of bitching today. Sony copies what everyone is doing and improves it by a slight degree. They have been doing that for 15 years. There is absolutely no room for debate in that.

Now, Nintendo. Putting a tablet and APPLYING IT TO A VIDEOGAME console could be considered the innovation here; mainly because it has never been done before. But, before I confuse myself, lets define 'innovation'.

'Innovation differs from invention in that innovation refers to the use of better and , as a result, novel idea or method, whereas invention refers more directly to the creation of the idea or method itself.'

With that in mind, I guess Sony neither invented nor innovated. Maybe it is better to say Nintendo invented motion control with Wii, and invented tablet function in a console. Sony thought about Move and did not act on it for 10 years until Nintendo grew a pair of balls and risked it all first by having motion as the premier incentive for their console.

"  Putting a tablet and APPLYING IT TO A VIDEOGAME console could be considered the innovation here; mainly because it has never been done before "

wrong

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzMM7j2dht8&feature=player_embedded

"Maybe it is better to say Nintendo invented motion control with Wii"

also wrong

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbTn8CGjVSs&feature=player_embedded

 

both taken from

http://www.cracked.com/article_19193_6-new-gaming-innovations-that-are-way-older-than-you-think_p2.html?wa_user1=5&wa_user2=Video+Games&wa_user3=article&wa_user4=recommended

That first link is a bit of a serious stretch for what you are trying to prove here.

The second link involves motion...but not with remote. The DS being an advanced 1980 Game & Watch, that make sense! The 2nd vid in relation to Wii...not really.

None of those things went mainstream as far as I know. If they did, they didn't last long. 3DS could technically be called a suped-up Virtual Boy, but why acknowledge it copying a certain product if the one it was copied from failed? The cherry pick is impressive but uh, I can't really concede here.



Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. "  thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."