Entroper on 30 January 2008
| Entroper said: What was so wrong with Civ 3? I thought culture and borders were pretty sweet, and they vastly improved the negotiations and treaties over Civ 2. I also liked the changes to combat regarding unit experience and hp, artillery units, and so forth. What did Civ 4 do besides refine the government system and go back to a square grid? (I admit, the square grid is worth it all by itself, I've hated isometric view with a passion since it was born. Also, I don't own Civ 4, so this is an honest question, not a rhetorical one.) |
Honest, guys, explain to me the differences. :) I've been a long time Civ fan and want to know if Civ 4 is worth buying. The demo wasn't really enough for me to get a feel for the game.
