happydolphin said:
Nobody shat on it. It's clear from what we've seen and what we know that it is a 96% carbon copy. That isn't bad per se, once you're over it. What's bad is people denying the truth at hand, and embellishing. There is nothing more irritating in the gaming community than that specific attitude. We need more neutrality in general. The elements you mentioned were discussed in the thread, so there is nothing ambiguous here. There are fundamental point-ranking differences, but much of the rest is 1 to 1. If you want inspiration, look at the other videos in the thread (power stone, smash compared to outfoxies), but PABR is to Smash what Palom is to Parom, i.e. a twin. So whether it's released or not, at this point with what we know about it, is not unfair. It's actually quite logical. |
This is the bit I'm confused about.
How can you say it when you haven't seen EVERYTHING the game has to offer. All you saw was a demo at E3, which is just the same stuff we've seen on GTtv so effectively it's just the same demo over again.
People shouldn't be dismissive of things after 1 glance.
Otherwise I could easily accuse Little Big Planet of being a Mario Rip off but it's clearly so much more.
I could say Soul Calibur copied Street Fighter because both games feature people fighting but that's really a stupid thing to do.
I could easily accuse Modnation Racers of being a Mario Kart Rip-Off but it's got its own qualities
I could also accuse Shift of being a me too o Gran Turismo 5
I could easily accuse the WIIU Propad of being a rip off of the 360 pad but it offers MUCH more
I could also accuse NSMBWii of being a little big planet ripp-off but clearly that's not true
I could also accuse Horizons of being a Test Drive Unlimited carbon copy but again without seeing much, I can tell it will be different
This list is literally endless my advice, wait for the game to come out fully and then see what it offers before calling it a rip off








