| IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Bolded: That's true, but the majority is very great. Majority? Where are you getting your data? Is that 51% because that isn't saying much. Italics: This is where the great minority comes in. Most of those people would settle for their cellphone/iPad/laptop. I've seen a study that shows that most handheld gaming is actually done in the home, it is used as a prefered console by many and is useful regardless is you are a constant traveller. Underlined: What? That would not be necessary. So a smarthpone/iPad/laptop is an option? Those are not cheap either. $1000 is an exaggeration because you can get a decent sized TV for less, and though there are subsidized smartphones there are still pricey and include expensive contracts. Rest: Don't fool yourself. People who prefer handheld gaming generally play Nintendo consoles and don't care for hardcore titles. All these small reasons to buy a Vita pales when compared to the massive smartphone market. People do not care (yet) about Vita. The PSP sold over 70 million (more than the PS3 or the 360 have sold), it was and is still a viable system with hardcore titles. Just because Nintendo is the market leader does not mean everything else isn't a good product/option. Consumers have already spoken. I am not close minded. I am just drawing my conclusions from what I see. |
Before the PS3 everyone was nice to me :(
