Civilization Revolution put on indefinite hold

[Entroper]

naznatips said:

Gnizmo said:

Civ 2 is just so much better than 4 it is ridiculous. I do like a few of the changes in 4 but for the most part they were just undoing the horror that was Civ 3.

I completely agree.

What was so wrong with Civ 3? I thought culture and borders were pretty sweet, and they vastly improved the negotiations and treaties over Civ 2. I also liked the changes to combat regarding unit experience and hp, artillery units, and so forth. What did Civ 4 do besides refine the government system and go back to a square grid? (I admit, the square grid is worth it all by itself, I've hated isometric view with a passion since it was born. Also, I don't own Civ 4, so this is an honest question, not a rhetorical one.)

Also, I wouldn't be surprised if they're having trouble getting the game to run in the Wii's limited amount of RAM.  The Civ games have been extremely RAM-hungry on the PC.