pezus said:
Play4Fun said:
Zim said:
PullusPardus said:
Play4Fun said:
pezus said:
teigaga said:
loool, i think most people missed the point from the post and comparison. These next gen pics are probably the least impressive we've seen leading up to a new generation. Of course they're better then the ps3 and current pc games, but what happens when you don't a million lava particles conveniently hovering over your hammer,..... The game won't look too far off what we've come to expect.
I'm excited but in comparison to previous generations, this is more a half step. Like the dreamcast vs gamecube. We're at a point where games are looking like HQ GCI, thats as good as graphics need to be. But without a doubt we will see more impressive things then those UE4 pics, we've haven't even seen it in motion, that could change everything.
|
If you really think games look like CGI you don't know a lot about graphics, do ya? They are nowhere close to that level.
|
If he is someone who isn't into the technical details then it's understandable why he thinks it looks close to CGI.
|
uh... who made that stupid comparision?
|
I believe it was the devs themselves. However stupid people try and use it to show CGI and game level is close. They aren't. What people don't understand is that that image is the xbox version, the PS3 version and the cgi version...FROM THE XBOX. It isn't some high calibur cgi.
Yet people use it to state game graphics are close to cgi, as though we are nearing avatar levels. Heck I still don't think we've seen a game that even matches Final Fantasy: The spirits within. And that is over 10 years old.
|
Oh, I'm stupid huh?
Just keep being bitter because people aren't as impressed with the screens as you are.
|
That CGI is around 8 years old...from a low-mid budget game. So it is not a proper representation of good CGI
|
Whatever.
I was just making a point about diminishing returns.
