Manchester has a title at last!!!!!!!!!!!

[crissindahouse]

kowenicki said:

crissindahouse said:

kowenicki said:

Carl2291 said:
Apparently, Man U's starting 11 in the last 3 games cost more than Man City's.

Ive not done the maths though... But people putting City down for spending mobey are silly.

Rooney. £27m
Young £20m
Ferdinand £30m (most expensive defender in thr world at the time)
Nani £20m
Smalling £12m
Evra £6m
De Gea £17m
Carrick £18m
Valencia £16m


Thats just off the top of my head... City arent the only ones who spend Millions upon Millions.

 

add in...

Anderson £20m (!!!!??)

Jones £17m

and numerous others that have truned out to be flops (Bebe, Kleberson, Forlan and veron anyone?  combined fees £50m)

 

and people can see that United havent brought any really decent players through youth for a very long time and they are a buying club.

the difference is, that city is spending more as the whole revenue is. at least in 2009 they did that. revenue was 100 million euro and they spent 120 million pound for new players.   manu doesn't do that. manu has what? 400 million revenue? if the spend 200 million in a few years and city is spending 160 million with 160 million revenue in one year, it's pretty simple to understand the difference.  can't be so hard to understand...

clubs should get a percentual limit of revenue for player transfers. this would make everything much better and wouldn't be such a joke like it is atm in the premier league.. yes, it is a joke if a cub is obviously spending much more as it is economical sustainable.

yeah that will be great...

big clubs stay big, small clubs stay small....  so whilst historically it was ok if some clubs like Man U and others had money pumped in or had huge debts to fund their current position... now thats not allowed any more.  Protectionist!  thats all this is about.  The big clubs want to stay where they are and dont want anyone crashing their party. 

lol i bet yoiu would think otherwise if a billionair would pump money in ten third-league clubs winning the championchips the next 40 years and liverpool, manu, arsenal and others would play in the second league then...

why are they so big? because they won titles, they grew with the fanbase and they won prize money. they deserve to have a better position than someone coming from nowhere with sheik abdullahs money.

do you wish to tell me that in the german league, where it isn't possible to play mr sheik, that we have a unfair league and the premier league is more fair? pahahahaha now THIS is funny. in germany, even the club without money can survive in the league because there aren't 5-10 who get everything from a sheik. your league is fair because a few clubs get money from billionairs? what's with all other clubs? don't they suffer because of that? don't they have a problem to reach champions league or even euro league because of that? you say exactly the opposite of the real situation, just a few clubs get a huge advantage against others in the premier league because of the billioniars.

has to be great to come from second league in premier league in uk to compete against 10 billionairs clubs and some others. yeah, very nice system.

"if you are lucky, even with a smaller fanbase, a sheik will get interest in your club and if you have no luck, like all other clubs, you can hope to stay in premier league because you wonÄt have a chance against the sheik club anymore""