IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
| IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
That part, yes. God drowned nearly every human on Earth before they had lived their entire lives. That is interfering.
|
Yes, it is very much interferring. However, did you ever take in to account that the people themselves, with their free willed descision chose to laugh, mock and shrug Noah's descision to listen to God? With all the warnings? Didnt they have a choice to follow Noah's warnings?
You should also take into account that much of the earliest stories of the new testament were passed on for tens of thousands of years through the mouth. These stories could have been accurate ,however, did you really think a snake really talked? Or was it the use of symbolism?
The snake, back then and I think still is now, is a symbol of evil. So you probably get the picture.
____
"In fact, all Abrahamic religions fall prey to that lack of logic. Why create humans in the first place if you knew exactly which one would end up in heaven and which ones would end up in hell even before creating them? Why create life that is destined to live an ethernity in hell? God is responsible for their misery, He created them, and knew where they would end up. He also know where you and your daughter will end up once you die, and your free will cannot affect that knowlegde as it is determined by God."
Remmember the long argument we had earlier? Did you learn anything about that? How free will and the almighty God can co-exist? Because this whole section that you just wrote seemed like we never talked about anything at all.
Dont tell me I just wasted my time.
|
Bolded: No, that would be me, since you obviously don't see the major logical flaw in the underlined where He created humans that are destined to go to hell.
Free will and an almighty God can only co-exist if God is able to create a rock that is so heavy that He cannot lift it. Can God do such a thing?
|
Something tells me that you haven read the convrsation between me and NintendoPie.
Here.
Lifting covers up the definition of translation, which means moving something from one point in space to another. With this in mind, the real question would be, "Can God move a rock from one location in space to another that is larger than possible?" In order for the rock to not be able to move from one space to another, it would have to be larger than space itself. However, it is impossible for a rock to be larger than space, as space will always adjust itself to cover the space of the rock. If the supposed rock was out of space-time dimension, then the question would not make sense, because it would be impossible to move an object from one location in space to another if there is no space to begin with, meaning the faulting is with the logic of the question and not God's capabilities.
If your talking about infinite weight force and irrelevant surface area. Then thats another matter. God can simply take away gravity in order to move this object in this three dimentional world.
