Mazty said:
He's not just a successful director, he's a millionaire.... Billionaire, if you're gonna derp, at least be specific about it..I'm guessing you'd like to have more money then you could ever possibly need. Who doesn't, but I don't have illusions. So you'd want to be the director who has to release more films reguarly then the one who has to only release one every decade because they are so popular and gross so much? I'd rather be the guy that doesn't spend 10 years tossing himself off whilst waiting for tech to exsist to make a pocahontas remake How'd you figure that out? More critics to bomb on him? What are you on about? I'm sorry, my brain uses logic and doesn't jump to random conclusions. Releasing another Avatar doesn't mean critics will "bomb on him"... 15 Years ago: Titanic: Big box office, disliked by many now. There is no universal law that a second Avatar film means that more critics will dislike it then the first one... Current: Avatar, harped on by many, nuff said. - Meanwhile, 28 years ago, created The Terminator. 26 years ago, less box office fapping, created arguably the best Aliens film, 23 years ago The Abyss. You think Avatar is going to be remembered for being a good movie like these are? Try using that so called logic of yours again. So instead of being snarky, make sense next time lmao, says the guy who knows nothing better than trolling, and gets banned for it. Nice one. |