| happydolphin said: I understand. I wasn't asking about whether their decision was a good one or a bad one. I was asking, given a decision (no matter whether it was good or not), given a decision to continue to support the Wii, what would have been the best way to serve the Wii: cater to casual/non-gamers, or cater to new markets (HD twins, other undiscovered markets, etc.)? Two options if they continued to support the Wii: 1) Cater to the usual Wii audience 2-simplified) Cater to another audience. What do you think would be better, 1 or 2, or both? What would be the resulting change in the HW trend graph in your opinion? |
Catering to the Casual Market I would say would be a dead end. Like I said before, I think the Wii U is pooped. It's done. I can assure you the casuals don't even care about their Wii anymore. It's just there.
I don't know what that other audience would be? Are you trying to say HardCore Market?
