pezus said:
KeptoKnight said:
pezus said:
KeptoKnight said:
pezus said:
Nem said:
To be honest multiplayer modes on single player modes tend to be lackluster and take out from the sigle player quality.
Indeed im of the opinion that single player and online multiplayer should be separated. The content and quality of a game built from the ground up to deliver an engaging online envyronment cant be compared to the barebones, boring offer of single player games multiplayer mode. Without any doubt these modes are just an effort to get more microtransaction money from suckers.
Also, when i want a single player game why the hell am i paying for a crapy multiplayer one? Might aswell separate them and offer quality experiences on both.
|
I highly disagree with this. Games can definitely have a great single-player as well as multi-player. Naughty Dog did it, why don't you think SSM can do it? They are basically running the whole Sony games show.
|
Sowwy, that is matters of opinions. Some of us prefer for a developer to put their total efforts into single player. A lot of these multiplayer feel generic. Its not needed. But from a business perspective its $$$.
|
Except sometimes a great dev can make a better single player with multiplayer than other devs can do with only single player. I fully trust in SSM to deliver here.
|
It might for your expectations. But not for many of us. Some of us have a J psychoogcial trait which place great emphasis having things orderly and sytematically fursnished eg. story, sound, gameplay, control etc...
I wonder how the ending of Mass Effect 3 would be like if they removed multiplayer from the gecko?
|
Why would the ending be any different. Bioware didn't need multiplayer to fuck up, just look at Dragon Age II
|
They releasing DLC this summer to clarify.
