happydolphin said:
Wiibox3. You can't have the cake and eat it though. If you go by the argument that power is the root reason for a generation (at the core), then you can't argue that the Wii is much more powerful than the gamecube, when we're speaking relatively, because a next-gen console it would have actually been much more powerful than the gamecube. As it were, Nintendo released an updated gamecube and branded it next-gen (marketing-wise). That's why it's important to realize that the gens can be defined in two ways (like Viper said it's all a timing thing, I'm saying it's both). As much as the Wii is a gen 6 caliber machine, it existed in gen 7, along with machines from the competition that actually gave the gen a reason for existence. @wiimote as accessory to cube. I see what you're saying, but I think aout 2-3 years is the usual timeline to start designing the HW of a next-gen system (Article dates back Feb 14 2004), so I think it would be fair to say that the new proposal with the cube at its core was the design inception of the upcoming Wii. So no I don't think it was referring to the cube if that's what you're saying, but to what eventually became the Wii. |
Though the Wii is much more powerful than a Gamecube:
Wii
CPU: IBM "Broadway" @ 729MHz (90nm)
GPU: ATI "Hollywood" @ 243MHz (3MB Texture RAM, 90nm)
Memory: 88MB Total
-24MB 1T-SRAM (for graphics - frame buffer?)
-64MB GDDR3 System Memory
Storage:
512MB Internal NAND Flash
SD card expansion slot
------------------------
Gamecube
CPU: IBM "Gekko" @ 485mhz (180nm)
GPU: ATI "Flipper" @ 162Mhz (180nm)
Memory: 43MB Total
-3MB 1T-SRAM (for graphics - 1MB texture, 2MB Frame buffer)
-16MB DVD and Audio buffer
-24MB 1T-SRAM System Memory
It's just not near as powerful as the other systems of it's generation.








