Panama said:
crissindahouse said:
Panama said:
Never seen games marked down due to them having no multiplayer. Especially RPGs. |
so you will tell me cod would get the same score without multi-player? no? why shouldn't a rpg which would work perfect with multi-player not get a small downvote then? if it would be the perfect game just without multi-player, they should give 100% even if it would be better with?
you can change your vassals with other people, why not playing together with them? have you seen the game? wouldn't it be great to play with friends?
but this did cost maybe 1%, nothing special.
|
Because MW2 and 3s campaigns were 3 hours long and sometimes tacked on multiplayer can be to the detriment of the package such as in Binary Domain. But if it was only 1% that's fair enough.
|
i don't know if it's only 1% but i would say it's only 1%. they didn't talk a lot about it in the review but they said that it would work very well in that game and if you have a system to change the characters with other people online, why not playing with them together? especially because the a.i. isn't that good, it would be better with friends.
