How to disprove free will using basic logic

[Jumpin]

IIIIITHE1IIIII said:

Jumpin said:
Actually, that would be basic circular logic. Both possible premises contain the assumption you are trying to prove (that repeating events on a single time line equal no free will; and that events not repeating on a multithreaded time line equals random events and therefore not free will). So it is logically fallacious.

There are more than two possible premises?

I didn't mean to imply time reversal was possible (it's not as far as I know), but rather the two possible premise 1's that can be extracted from the first post.