Kasz216 said:
You missed my point... which was essentially the Hitler "Time man of the Year" arguement. I'd also argue that economics isn't really about confirming ones biases. Well no more then any other sceince. They all CAN be used that way with numbers.... but there are accurate ways to use the numbers and to actually see what has happened everytime you've done something. I will agree though that the main problem with economics is people trying to find a general unifying theory behind it. Largely because people are the basis of the economy and different peoples and times have different cultures. Have identical problems in different parts of the world, and try and fix them with the same solution and your results will likely change DRASTICALLY based on the culture of the people. Some people may react to government spending as a good sign. Others may take it as a sign of how bad the economy is and wait for things to improve etc. |
TIme's Man of the Year isn't even in the same category as winning a Nobel Prize, unless you count significant enough impacting events good or bad is the same as being competent in a given area.
Thing about science is you can replicate it via experimentation normally. You really can't do that with economics. I would even be hard pressed to call economics a science. There are claims of laws, which are kinda laws, but not in the same way physics has laws. And I am not even bringing up wha the Austrian school of economics has to say about economics either.