theprof00 on 26 April 2012
| Kasz216 said: Except you know... it clearly isn't correct. The key word there is "Way things are normally estimated". In general the "way things are normally estimated" are done so at face value without any actual digging into effects. It's like how the GAO reports that by the way it's traditionally reported the New Healthcare law will save money, though they admit it's really unlikely most if any of those savings will actually reach fruition. |
Oh, right, the conspiracy angle. How could I forget?
Let's not forget that the "researchers" themselves note limitations in their own conclusions and that very small discrepancies could result in major differences in their numbers.
Or how it isn't peer reviewed. Or..wait, do I need to continue?
