By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
Rainbird said:

Regardless of the arguments made in such a video, it's important to remember that it's basically a pitch. Someone is trying to sell you on an idea, and regardless of the quality of said idea, not to mention the people behind it, pitching with fear is an easy way of gathering attention and mindshare.

I don't know how real the arguments are, I don't know american politics nor much about economy, but I do know that we need to prepare for the future. We're completely dependant on fossil fuels at the moment, both for energy but in the case of oil, for many other products as well. The world economy is basically attached to oil, which makes it all the more crucial that we deal with peak oil. This makes me sceptical of arguments regarding "America's cheap energy sources", as, while America has definitely had cheap energy, that's not something that lasts forever, and something has to be done.

As such I can't help but be sceptical of the whole thing.

Peak Oil has the same issue Global Warming does.

Peak Oil was supposed to happen in like... 1998.

Oil SHOULD run out at some time, but it's pretty clear that the models involved were greatly exagerrated and don't include many new discoveries of oil and just new ways to access it.

When we really are approaching peak oil... the governments will know it for real, both sides... and will get a lot more serious about it.

I thought the issue was that peak oil predictions were made during the 50s or 60s when the economy was just going on at a remarkable clip, before stagflation of the 70s and then the strong cyclical recessions after that, and that the slower-than-projected economy is the reason peak oil has been pushed back, as well as general effeciency, more than new discoveries (especially since a lot of those discoveries don't yet break even on fossil fuel usage, like the tar sands).



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.