| slowmo said:
In general I forgot to mention at a short length there is rarely any difference in HDMI cables, it's only when you start to look at cables in excess of 10m where manufacturing quality will improve reliabvility and compatability with devices as the digital signal is more likely to be transmitted more reliably on cables that have less cross talk. Better cables will also be harder to damage which can produce signal degradation too. Despite HDMI standards some devices will naturally output stronger signals than others and some displays will be better at reconstructing a damaged or deteriotaed signal so a cable that works for one TV isn't guaranteed to work for another for example (again very long cables). |
Sorry, I failed to mention that.
I did mention that a poor HDMI cable will be more likely to break and will just not work leaving a blank screen. I've heard that if you have a very long HDMI cable that is very cheap you can get artefacting, but it isn't really a drop in quality, the artefacting is more like coloured blotches and sparkles. Anybody who has this won't think that the image quality is poor, they will think that something is seriously broken.
It's a possibility that he is mistaking an anologue cable for a HDMI cable, but given his post history, I doubt it.








