By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
logic56 on 20 April 2012
Edit Thread
RolStoppable said:
logic56 said:

the second part is the reason I posted in the first place, highlighting doesn't render the whole post irrelevant, I only highlighted it as I didn't think Sony ever said that and considering your proof made it even more funny, you commented under the same gist, I never once said Sony admitted that, I threw you a bone  to move on

ever heard someone say "ok assuming that is true", yeah same thing, I'm not saying it's true but to move one I'll pretend to accept said point

and you've never proved Sony said that either, your clinging to a personal achievement P.R. statement and your own made up assumptions, because you know, if the PS3 lived up to Sony's expectations it would be a success, and well we can't have that now can we...

For once, can you please stop the obsession you have with competing with the Vita for the more ironic name?

You bolded one part of a post and responded with one question, making it clear that you were only responding to the one specific part you bolded.

and you responded with this:

"http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/110438/Kaz_Hirai_Sets_150m_Lifetime_Target_For_PS3.php

It was all over the internet in July 2008, so this was well after the PS3 was off to a rocky start."

to which I responded

"clinging to a personal P.R. statement......made in 2008, that's just bloody sad"

the reaction (Because somehow it flew right the fuck over your head) was: REALLY... THAT'S where he got that from......that's just bloody sad

in which case you tried to prove with every subsequent post that somehow that was their realistic expectation, all of your logic being backed up by no proof only assumptions that of course you would have hence the "and we can't have that can we", they spent a lot of RnD on PS3 to get the technology out there hence the part of my post you ignored

you try way to hard to be clever man, it's ok though, I still love you bro...