| RolStoppable said:
Do you want to fight? Or do you want to discuss? One of my posts from one month ago. The main issue I see here is that too many people are emotionally invested in sales discussions. So whenever I say that 3D Mario games don't cut it, it's perceived to be equal to calling these games bad. As for spitting, that should be equated with llamas. |
I remember that comment. Fair you say great game, but the general lines are that it is lesser, that's the way I understand your rhetoric.
Emotionally invested? Yes many of us are, of course we are, we value these companies and the entertainment they offer us. I don't want to fight, but you've made me so damn bitter.
"So whenever I say that 3D Mario games don't cut it, it's perceived to be equal to calling these games bad."
That's why you need to nuance your posts and be less provocative. If you're provocative, you tend to just exaggerate one side of the issue without showing the nuances and it gives us the wrong idea. Constantly.
If a game doesn't cut it, it misses the mark. Yet many of these games you hint at are gems, Galaxy being one of them. If awesomeness is what matters, why do the "low" sales of Galaxy even matter? How awesome really can a 2D Mario be, and if it can be really awesome, then how much needs to be injected to realize it? NOT MUCH! So why bring down Galaxy when NSMB awesome can be made by the brush of a hand?
