By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jay520 said:
Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
ZaneWane said:
maximrace said:
Ah the ps defence force! I think it took the ps3 quite long considering the superior brand name and ps2 dominance... Who should have thougt this 7years ago. But in the end it doens't matter... Only the true fanboys kick on this sort of gap philosophy... What matters is that both consoles were immensely popular and got awsome games ;) (coming from a big xboxfan... I just don't care about sale places... I only care about the games...

quoted for truth


Quoted for awesomeness. 

Why would you focus on such an old breakthrough (MS competing with the PS brand) when a more recent breakthrough is happening right now (the PS3 possibly catching the 360)?

Sure, the latter is a little old too, we saw that the PS3 was catching up since 2010. But it's still more relavent than something that was established in 2007/8

Because some people rather judge an overall situation instead of a few years. I think that the fact that microsoft realy competed with sony this gen is much more important than a stupid gap. Both are winners ( looking at the games, but one won more than the other)