By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
Player1x3 said:
Kasz216 said:
Player1x3 said:
Kasz216 said:
Mnementh said:
Kasz216 said:
Mnementh said:
killerzX said:

 

,

The large difference currently is that Palestine isn't a nation.  Other nations existence are less disputable because they are currently nations.

An "flipped" example would be something like Kosovo.  Which was disputable as a nation, then became one, and now it a nation.  This is slightly different since more or less Palestine is more of a "no mans land" then it is a part of Israel, but it's closer then compaing Palestine to say Greece, later Kosvo or even something like South Ossetia.

 


Kosovo was never in its entire history of existence even close of becoming anything even remotely related to a nation. The most close it got when it was an autonomous province within Serbia. And no one even referred to it as a province before that. It was just a geographical region, like Rock Mountains.  And even when the war was over, Resolution 1244 assured that Kosovo would remain as a Serbian territory. But of course USA and the other Westerners broke that Resolution (cuz you know, they need to build their bases and feed their paranoia of Russia) and that's why kosovo is considered an independent nation by some people today. Even tho Kosovo  is everything but ''independent''

See... Palestine?  Nothing you said there actually differs from Palestine... well outside of Russia.


It doesn't differ from Israel either...i mean Israel and Palestinia are 2 different names for the same region


Except for the part where Israel's been a legitamite country since 1948... with the "palestinian" parts largely in Israeli hands because Egypt and Jordan didn't want to bother anymore.


I'd hardly call it legitimate. Palestine has as much right to become an independent nation as Israel