Paul said:
No I don't because that's not what the article says. It says the vita will have to surpass the sales of the PSP (most probably in it's lifetime on the market) in order to become profitable in the first 3 years of its existance. That's what the current CEO of Sony said, not me. I was responding to your post in response to the other guy's when he stated that going forward, only MS will be able to absorb the losses of putting a very powerful console on the market at a competitive price. In response you said "uhh see Vita", which anyone with any ability to reason would notice that Sony should probably try to avoid in the future given the fact that they are currently losing billions of dollars |
no that's what the article said Kaz said he would like for it to have sold more than the psp not that it needed to
and they not losing any money on selling the vita that's the point I've discussed this before I'm sure of it