Plezbo said:
This is just how war was fought back then. Ask China if they liked how entire cities and villages were murdered by the Japanese. We could have conventionally bombed Japan, but the results would have been no better. And the nukes were not to keep the Soviets from invading, they were to stop us from having to invade. Estimates are that we would have lost 1 million soldiers invading Japan and subduing the populace. Due to the mass Suicides on Saipan and Guam, we werent't even sure if there would be a Japanese nation left if we invaded and had to fight til the last man standing. The Nukes, while terrible, ended up saving millions of lives at the cost of several hundred thousand. If this seems callous, war is horrible, Japan brought that war upon itself by invading sovereign nations and attacking US land. The fact is that we have a nuclear arsenal, and it is here to stay. If we got rid of all of our nuclear weapons, the North Koreas and Irans of the world could hold everyone hostage with a single bomb. North Korea understands now that if it uses nuclear weapons it is doomed. They keep their small supply because they are paranoid and backward and believe it is the only thing keeping America and SK from invading. Your worldview is idealist, and you should be proud of it, never lose that. Unfortunately it is also very naive. |
how can you not regret dropping nukes on japan. btw idk if you know but you didnt meantion the birth defects still occuring today due to radiation. also its not true that it was the last choice, japan was willing to surrender with conditions - its just that the americans chose a miltary choice and not a diplomatic one.







