The King and Queen of Pop

[leo-j]

Rath said:

PlaystaionGamer said:

SaviorX said:

Rath said:
Lady Gaga is the biggest win of style over substance in a long time. They created such a mass of marketing around her look, her name and her actions that people failed to realise that her songs were just pretty ordinary pop.

At least she's a hell of a lot better than Nikki Minaj though, that chick makes my ears bleed I swear.

Her and ol' Biebermiester are complete creations. Its like the labels came up with a prototypical popstar and out spawned Bieber/Gaga

 

There are literally teams of people out there writing, recording, mastering, mixing every word of every lyrics he's ever said. I'm not hating because hes a young male singer...I'm just embarrassed by the obvious.

while im trying not to feed you..

a bit of searching on Gagas past to when she was around 19 (years before being signed) she was down in Lower east side New york calling herself Lady Gaga performing the same way she does now. So explain how she is created? if she came to the label the same as she is now.. how did they create her?

Its so funny people run around calling Gaga manafactured when she clearly isnt.. thats why she got so famous in the first place because she wasnt a manafactured pop star. Katy Perry, Rihanna, Nicki Minaj, Justin Bieber are all creations from a record label, there wernt like this before they got famous. Infact the first 3 are proven to be creations by there label because as soo as Lady Gaga got so massive the labels dressed them differently! 

Lady Gaga wasn't Lady Gaga until she was picked up by the record labels. Her look and name were both picked as marketing gimicks. Female pop stars have been dressing strange at least since Gracie Jones and Madonna.

 

Here's a source, it's a tabloid I'm afraid.

http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/music/who_that_lady_CBlHI927dRlLmIwjVfGrwK/2

Her look was NOT EVER a marketing gimmick, it is NOW by other labels, but SHE WAS COMPLETELY OUT THERE HERSELF and took a huge risk, and her label followed on that risk, she made it clear she wanted to be the biggest pop star on earth, and made it clear she had what it took to get there.....

DEF JAM DROPPED HER for not being what RIHANNA and all those fake singers were at the time here's a song about it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THDZRhw-ANo

she wrote it herself.... lady gaga's story is legendary to ALL of hollywood, people have known about her since years before she was so big, everyone knew who she was in hollywood, everyone respects the shit out of her, everyone LOOKS DOWN on SPEARS/PERRY/RIHANNA/MINAJ and the majority of pop stars today, and in the past because they DID SELL OUT, KATY PERRY was first marketed to be an AVRIL LAVIGNE RIP OFF, but SHE FLOPPED, so they re did her entire career, and she accepted it, SHE'S A FAKE ARTIST, simple as that. GAGA NEVER GAVE UP AND FOUGHT AND BECAME WHAT SHE DID BECAUSE SHE WANTED TO, not because interscope forced her....

hell BOYS BOYS BOYS, STARSTRUCK the most likely NEXT SINGLES from THE FAME could have been two more #1's to tie michael jackson like perry did, and her label told her to release them, and she said NO, MY FANS DESERVE NEW MUSIC, I WROTE AN ALBUMS WORTH OF MUSIC, THAT I FEEL IS CAPABLE OF CHANGING POP MUSIC ONCE AGAIN, AND SHE RELEASED THE FAME MONSTER, WHICH IS THE STAPLE FOR BASICLLY EVERY POP ALBUM SINCE THAT ALBUM CAME OUT, EVERYTHING ELSE IS A CARBON COPY OF THE FAME MONSTER, and you cannot DENY THIS at all...... most of the industry is FOLLOWING that album, and why not? IT'S THE BEST SELLING ALBUM IN A DECADE.