By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Galaki said:
Mr Khan said:

1) Sony was trying to screw over Nintendo with the PlayStation even during the partnership. Under terms of the deal being cast, Nintendo would have had to pay Sony royalties to place Nintendo games on the Super Nintendo PlayStation, and why would they have done that?

This come up quite often with people assuming Nintendo being stupid for backing out of the deal when Sony tried to bully them.

Sony was going to have rights to all Nintendo IP, too, I think?


Yeah, you're right the contract was complete bull. But niether of them knew what they were doing. Launching a SNES-CD console while Sony released a console on the side that played SNES cartridges and Sony CD's (not SNES-CD's that would be limited to the SNES-CD). Yes there was a clause that gave Sony way too much control over games written on SNES-CD, not the IP's but just the games and associated stuff with them. Nintendo still owned the IP's.

I guess Nintendo backing out was good for gaming, prevented whatever crazyness was in that contract. It's still a bummer for Nintendo that it created such a strong competitor and as I mentioned earlier probably contributed to Sega's Dreamcast ship sinking. Too many slices not enough pie, thought the same thing would happen when the Xbox came out but look how big the gaming market is now!



Before the PS3 everyone was nice to me :(