d21lewis said:
logic56 said:
VicViper said:
logic56 said:
reminds me of the 2000 USA presidential election
edit: re-reading your final verdict and reasons behind it have contradicted your entire point and renders this is ENTIRE comparison utterly useless.
TLDR:
yeah the Vita is better in almsot every way bar the 3ds having better game library which I will admit is ONLY becasue it was out a year ahead (which makes no sense becasue it's something the Vita can't help but whatever) but I'm giving it to 3ds anyway becasue it was out longer
|
What a terrible logic. It has more games NOW, period. This is not a comparison for the future, and even if it was, most predictions would agree that 3DS game superiority will continue, if not grow wide (especially japan)
Using this line of thinking, 3DS is less powerful ONLY because it was released before, so that shouln't count to
|
really??
you think it makes sense to create a LENGTHY OP comparing two products when the ONLY deciding factor is because the 3ds was out longer
here let me do this thread:
comparison of the Vita and 3DS: 3DS wins because it was it was out longer
you see, you see how easy that was, wasted no ones time and spared writing a bunch of stuff only to render it all bullshit later
lol at terrible logic that made me chuckle
|
I'm just one random guy on the internet. It doesn't really matter which one I chose, does it? When this thread was created, I asked people for input. I barely got any response. What's done is done.
Anyway, the purpose of this thread wan't just a winner or a loser. The purpose was to compare the consoles based on many variables. To educate, more or less. If you liked the comparison but hated the final result, does everything else suddenly become moot? You're not one of those guys that just cares about the final score in a review, are you? The comparisons written before the end is what I thought was important. As a piece of hardware, the Vita thoroughly trounces the 3DS--but we are gamers. Games won. I regret nothing.
|
pretty much, as that is the basis of a comparison for winner, now if you said here's my thoughts on the many ups and downs of the systems YOU decide who you think is the winner, the case would be very different, people could draw their own conclusions without rendering the entire comparison worthless in the end
and I hate it when reviews do stupid shit like that, yeah the game is great, almost everything is amazing but here's this mediocre score for a absolutely pointless reason, my ideal world is just the review, no score no winner no loser, but if you must the comparison must be fair if not there is no point like the HRT team in this years Formula 1 World Championship
