DanneSandin on 24 March 2012
| Joelcool7 said: Guys I wasn't saying WiiU could DreamCast just that superior hardware launching first has lost in the past. Even if Sega had the finances to keep DreamCast on the market it would still have failed to beat PS2. Sega was going down earlier but DreamCast was an exceptional machine and lost despite an early launch some amazing software and a ground breaking innovations. Even an amazing machine with a head start can lose! I think the defining factor that will form the outcome is if Microsoft or Sony can offer all of the WiiU functionality and more for a competitive price. If they can successfully offer Nintendo's features at a price consumers can afford then they could very well take Nintendo's throne even with Nintendo's head start. Though one should redefine king of the generation. If Microsoft won the generation market share wise having double the sales Nintendo had. But lost money on every single unit and only profited a billion dollars the whole generation due to strong software sales. But Nintendo profited 3-billion due to a profit on every machine and software sales. Who really won the generation? |
4 sure! You really have too factor in three things: Sold systemes, sold games and earned money! Then, and only then, do you have a winner!
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.







