By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aj_habfan said:
--OkeyDokey-- said:
Sal.Paradise said:

IGN reviews, there to be laughed at. 

 


What is this supposed to mean? Nintendogs is definitely better at being a virtual pet game than Ninja Gaiden 3 is at being an action game. 

Yea I don't get these random comparisons either.

The only potential problem with this review is if it was done purely for publicity, but I don't believe that theory. I don't have a hard time believing the reviewer just had an awful experience with this game and it is his job to call it like he sees it. You can't blame him that God Hand got a score you feel too low, or that a casual game you'll never play seems to be scored too high.


yep, people should stop comparing different genres if they don't like one of the genre. i read an interview with some guys from famitsu half a year or so ago in a german magazin and they said they only look at how good a game is for people who look at this kind of game. so if there would be a game about painting houses and it would as good as even possible they would give a perfect score even if they would hate it.

and that's what a review is about, giving people who look at those games a good decison help. and if people like games with little dogs i believe nintendogs will be great for them.

ok, ign won't give a game they hate a perfect score even if they know it is perfect for people who look for this but still...

it's like i would compare ninja gaiden 3 with a good baseball game and would laugh about it just because i hate baseball. that wouldn't make any sense.

and it should be clear that for fans of ninja gaiden black and even ninja gaiden 2 the third one will be a huge disappointment for most of them.