IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
What the fuck are you talking about? Firstly, "we" are leaving the Middle East. Secondly, how would minimizing the security make us less vulerable to terrorists? "We" are not destroying ourselves within our borders; we are defending ourselves. The more effort, the less casualties. |
Absolutely wrong. Have you read at all about the reasons for the attack on 9/11? We had bases on the Muslim Holy Lands, and we kept interjecting into other nation's internal affairs. Without being asked to. We created the problem of them wanting to come here in the first place. If you don't realize that, then you can't begin to understand how to resolve this.
And, no, we are not leaving the Middle East. I have no idea where you're getting that from. We have bases all over the place over there. And when we pulled most of the combat brigades out of Iraq last year (for purely political reasons) we replaced them all with DoD contractors, who by the way, cost MORE than combat troops.
I would argue that there is a big difference between defending ourselves and overreacting to something that our government's policies caused in the first place. And private airport security NOT run by bureaucrats would do a much better job with safety, and they would do it without destroying the 4th amendment.







