This thread is the final prove that bans on this page are not well balanced. It really depends on the mood of the mods that are online if someone is banned or not, and this is very bad for the reputation of the page.
I think we need to do a few things to improve this. One is to make such a protocol as Rol suggested.
The second thing is that posts from a banned user shouldn't be displayed empty anymore, this makes it absolutely impossible for people to find out why someone was banned. Also, it is very annoying to look through a thread and have empty posts all the time just because the poster is banned for something he did in a completely different thread.
The third thing is, bans from mods shouldn't be definitive before stof and benkenobi have checked them. From what I understand, those two are the "chief-mods" and they should decide who is banned and who isn't, this is the only possibility to make sure that the bans are balanced.
Those things have all been brought up a lot of times already, and the system is still not working. We need to change that now if we want VGChartz to become a big website with a good reputation; it can't be that we have to (legitimately) discuss the same topic every time again when a popular user is banned.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
