Panama said:
Persistantthug said:
This is why I go with METACRITIC.
Because even if said reviewer lies (Gamespot), once you get 50 - 100 different reviews, once they're averaged up, the liars are basically made trivial.
METACRITIC is awesome for cases like this. :)
Metacritic may not be as objective as one thinks in that they still handpick their reviews. Numercial scores for videogames are becoming quite problematic.
Then I offer you this challenge....Find me 90'ish scored XBOX 360 or PS3 retail disk based game that doesn't deserve to be rated in the 90's.
(90's = GREATNESS)Find me this game please.
http://www.metacritic.com/games
[game must have a minimum of 50 "pro" reviews ]
[please keep your selected games no earlier than 2008 releases...thanks]
