| RolStoppable said: You say you use it at work and then add questions you should already know the answers to. Based on other polls, significantly more than 1 % have an issue with homosexuality. And based on responses in man-bear-pig's thread, many who would welcome these new rules do so because they don't want to see pictures of men anymore. You are one of the few who actually is concerned because he is surfing this website at work. You got by for over five years already without ever asking for an option to hide avatars. This suggests it really isn't that big of a problem and thus not necessary to force dozens, if not hundreds, of users to change their avatars and signatures. |
I fully agree with you. As I said to pezus... I'm not the one who complained to anyone. I just stated my opinion that some avatars (a very rare number), I have to scroll past to ensure they are not on my screen.
It doesn't really bother me that much, but I was just giving an example of when it does. That asian pic a few pages back I mentioned is an exact reason why. That is clearly too much.
I am not a mod nor have I ever requested to be one. I think the mods job is to make decisions on what is NSFW and as such should PM those who are. I don't think we need draconian rules as set forth in this thread's OP, but the status quo was fine so long as mods actively knew what users changed their avatars to and ask offenders to change.
