kowenicki said:
Torillian said:
DirtyP2002 said:
kowenicki said:
well surely its a good thing... no?
failing to see anything negative in this.
AAAA will refer to the importance MS are putting on it and the likely budget.
|
read pezus posts, he will find something. Wait for VG King to double check.
|
sigh, even a silly little thread like this turns into us against them apparently.
No there is nothing negative about MS making a new game, and I'm very happy for you all. There is however something silly about taking an overly used and nearly meaningless industry term like AAA and making up an even more ridiculous term in an attempt to show how serious you are. The negative would be if this caught on and then we had another term quickly become meaningless so MS's next game would have to be AAAAA and so on and so forth.
|
happy for you all?
regarding the bold... not really, getting so worked up about the number of AAAA's is what is really ridiculous.
|
"If this was a sony announcement then this forum would be drooling all over it.
But all we get is weak sarcasm and cheap jibes..."
the "we" in your statement is probably the same "you all" in mine. MS fans, 360 owners, however you want to think about it.
Honestly I don't see people getting worked up, just making light of a funny situation. I hate to extoll the virtues of someplace that won't even let VGChartz be mentioned but I think the thread on this subject on NeoGaf is the same. Fortunately over there you can tell jokes about something without it turning into a platform fan fight. Here we often aren't so lucky.
