| Aldro said:
Now don't go find a way to go around this. It clearly says Pre-Alpha. I was at the game convention in Sweden called Gamex in 2010?? November. It said Pre-Alpha there and I remember the full version making me drop my pants even more. |
Do we know what stage in dev Gears 2 was at E3 2010? I thought Pre-alpha came long before a game was ready for release, not months before release. Also do we know what stage the playable E3 demo was at? I thought alpha was characteristic of games which aren't ready to play yet.
Either Way, E3 2008, IGN said Gears 2 looked better then Killzone 2, both games were incomplete works, both games released relatively close together. Yes KZ2 released 3.5 months later, but it was in dev since earlier too (They also had playable versions as early as Playstation Day in August 2007, same can't be said for Gears 2), so there is no reason to think one game was more close to complete then the other.
Also P.S. to the other guy...I think MGS4 looks better then KZ2, can you find an article by some website (preferably a well known one) that says MGS4 looks better then Killzone 2? Otherwise I'll stick to what IGN say and put Gears 2 above KZ2, and personaly put Gears 3 above KZ3 (I know you put KZ3 1 rank above Gears 3, so it's really a matter of preference).
P.P.S. To add to my preference comment and how every game has their own benefits. L.A. Noire, although overall not that spectacular to look at, has the best face animations out of all games. So if facial expressions are a big deal for graphics for you, L.A. Noire would be your best graphics choice.
What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database 
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results
