I think it's safe to say the PS3 is the definitive graphics king for this gen

[Michael-5]

killerzX said:

Michael-5 said:

killerzX said:

Michael-5 said:

I am biased?, you took my linked source and said ", but......I don't accept it, so it's not true.......wahhh."

killzone was released a nearly a year after e3, ign impression were based off of pre-alpha footage, the article said nothing about any playable demo.

e3 impression of games are completely meaningless, especially when camparing a game a couple months away from release which is nearly finished (gears) and a game nearly a year away (killzone 2).

no, i dont accept the link because its meaningless, why would we base best graphics of unfinished unreleased versions of games. thats utterly idiotic.

You realize pre-alpha is also pre-demo? It's unfinished and generally unplayable...... IGN played a playable level, and said Gears 2 looked better.

Also Killzone 2 released 3 months after Gears, really not that far off. I like how 7 months is nearly a year, and 4 months is a couple (meaning 2).

Do you accept these facts? or am I biased again?

you realize, you lied again, as usual.

pre-alpha, is still playable. its just a early build, non-finished. just like the killzone 3 beta in december was pre-alpha. i saw nothing about them playing a level in that article, but i will take you at your word (which i shouldnt because you constantly lie and misrepresent, and back track on you own words).

also it was nearly 4 months after gears, 8 months after e3. thats a hell of a long time in game development. i was slihghtly exagerated the timeframes to get accross a point (i also thought gears 2 released in September) in other words...you lied.

but none of that matters ign, gave their impressions of games during e3, before the games were release. they were unfinshised builds, opinions of nonreleased games. it doesnt matter we are talking finished product here. and by your own argument, MGS4 has better graphics than Killzone 2. because ign, said MGS4 had better graphics than gears 2.yup, that is correct.

yes you are very very very biased. i dont think i have every seen someone more biased before, and think they are innocent at the same time.

Guess you don't know your greek ABC's... Alpha comes before beta, not the other way around, and no they don't overlap, they are different stages in development.

Pre-Alpha is before the character models are all finished, Alpha is when all the models are done, and the game is technically playable, beta is the stage where they smooth it all out.

This below is pre-alpha

Notice, no background, floor, and only a character model? Not at all playable...

Take a guess which game it's for.