RolStoppable said:
Bleeding edge and cutting edge is the same thing. I had already typed the below two paragraphs, so I just leave them there. It's mostly a repeat of what I said before though. The business model of selling an engine like the UE to other developers is built around the fact that creating an own engine would be too costly, couldn't be done in time or both. Since the AAA PC game market is diminishing with more and more developers opting for home consoles, Epic consequently becomes more dependent on the console business as well. Epic spends years on their engines, based on what they expect the next standard in graphics to be. Now if all three console manufacturers opt for marginal improvements over the current HD consoles, then where does this leave Epic? Hardly anyone will need their bleeding edge Unreal Engine 4, because they can simply optimize their existing game engines and all the money that Epic spent in the last six or so years on their engine will hardly pay off. |
Rol, bleeding edge is above cutting edge so much so that you bleed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleeding_edge_technology
Anyways, for the rest, the only reason I can think of is as someone mentioned before: overshooting (so lost investment), but that devs would not pay for the next version of UE by customizing UE3 is going a little far and borderline illegal.
