theprof00 said:
Paul said:
theprof00 said:
RolStoppable said:
theprof00 said:
A dedication that wavers depending on the tide it seems. |
You would have a point, if kowenicki didn't post year over year numbers in weekly sales threads regardless of what they show.
|
kowenicki on 06 February 2011
monsterone said:
...so if we were to adjust sales for comparable time on the market, which console has sold more? I have been wondering this for a while. seems odd that I havent scene this on the forums before. any info would be great.
|
its boring (been discussed a bazillion times)
irrelevant (an install base is an install base)
and bloody easy to work out.....
so why start a thread to ask?
kowenicki on 20 October 2009
leo-j said:
kowenicki said:
oh good god... again!?
and i counter that with since the PS3 has been out the 360 has sold more... so since the choice has been available to buy either... people have chosen the 360 more than the PS3.
both stats are red herrings however.
only LTD counts..
now everyone move along nothing to see here. |
he is trying to see the ps3 is selling at a much faster rate than the 360 did in its 2-3rd year.
|
yeah and Im saying that more people have chosen the 360 over the PS3 when both have been available.... therefore the 360 is more poular..
the 360 was also up against a very strong and very cheap PS2 when it launched. you cant compare like this.
cant you see these are bollocks stats...
only ltd counts.
-
Spare me your venom
|
What's your point in all this exactly?
|
Hmm, I already wrote it, so I'm not going to condescend to you by repeating something you could've/should've/would've read by now.
|
So your point is that the Vita is doing great because its worldwide sales so far are equal to the sales the PSP achieved in only one region over the same time period?
