Stefl1504 said:
Final-Fan said:
Stefl, you've completely failed to explain why the Jailkeeper role was specifically named as an exception to your "Linkz must have been the blocker" hypothesis. That is, why would Linkz NOT have used the Jailkeeper role on you if you think he would have blocked you with any other blocking role? |
Okay--- thinking about it... I think a jailkeeper should rather protect someone than use his ability to hinder an action taken... well a jailkeeper to me is more like a nerfed doc than an nerfed roleblocker... so I must I have thought of it how I would use the jailkeeper ability... I should rethink my postition on that... but I think a jailkeeper would use his ability in another way than a roleblocker, and I think linkz wouldn't have targeted me if he was a jailkeeper... simply, thats why I believe linkz isn't a jailkeeper and if there was a roleblocker, other than the jailkeeper, its him...
Sorry I did not get that you were asking for that specificaly...
|
We have a differing opinion on the Jailkeeper role. It is pretty much the best protection role since it offers a pro-town outcome regardless of who is targeted. Target town and they won't die.(though yes they'll lose their night action) Target scum and they can't use a night action.(though yes they can't be killed by vig or third party)
If you don't have a good idea who is likely town, non-power, and a probable kill target, then you wouldn't try to stop the kill directly by aiming for likely scum?
