Stefl1504 on 09 March 2012
| Final-Fan said: Stefl, you've completely failed to explain why the Jailkeeper role was specifically named as an exception to your "Linkz must have been the blocker" hypothesis. That is, why would Linkz NOT have used the Jailkeeper role on you if you think he would have blocked you with any other blocking role? |
Okay--- thinking about it... I think a jailkeeper should rather protect someone than use his ability to hinder an action taken... well a jailkeeper to me is more like a nerfed doc than an nerfed roleblocker... so I must I have thought of it how I would use the jailkeeper ability... I should rethink my postition on that... but I think a jailkeeper would use his ability in another way than a roleblocker, and I think linkz wouldn't have targeted me if he was a jailkeeper... simply, thats why I believe linkz isn't a jailkeeper and if there was a roleblocker, other than the jailkeeper, its him...
Sorry I did not get that you were asking for that specificaly...
