KONY 2012: Bring a war criminal to justice campaign : What do you think about this ?

[happydolphin]

PullusPardus said:

happydolphin said:

PullusPardus said:

You're being very optimistic, its not black and white, no bad guy and good guy ,I'm not spewing filth, I am talking about experience.

what was the american interest that lead them to go to Iraq?

@bold. I think in Iraq the vested interest was mostly oil, and possible instability in the middle east. The Zionist party is strong in the US, as well as a need for natural resources.

That's my thought. I may be wrong though. Mind you, the vested interest is a certainty. I'm just not sure as to the what.

their interest is oil and remove the old law so that more extremists show up and then they're going to sell them weapons.

of course no one does it because its a good thing to do, its just for the profit, same will happen to uganda , remove regime , act like you are doing it for good, secure oil , conquer, smash, trash then sell them weapons and watch it burn while your state gets more powerful, oldest trick in the book, "divide and conquer"

But you don't know what is cause and what is effect.

Let's say the US does intervene. This Kona is done away with. Which country will benefit the most? From what I remember from the movie, the LSA region moved from Uganda to other places. It is a regional threat against a criminal, not a national threat. That's one place of misplaced logic. Second is, if this helps those countries prosper (which it should with better order and structure), then the effect would be yes, that these countries would want more military structure as well. They can buy weapons from the states, but they can very well buy them from Europe or Russia. If they end up buying them from the states, is it part of the plan or just cause and effect?

I would be to argue it is a debatable point indeed.