PBBN43 said:
A demonym derived off United Stated could be less ambiguous, like "United Statesian". It doesn't sound good (especially in English), but it's more adequate. Although, perhaps it would be more suitable to not use a demonym as the US doesn't have a "proper" country name like the rest of the countries do. Lots of cities don't have a demonym and I've never seen anyone complain about that. And if "It is not out of arrogance that we use the term American" how can you explain US citizens referring to the country as "America"? That seems arrogant to me. |
I think that it would be more inconvenient to not have anything for citizens of the US. It is a quick and easy way to identify someone as from a country, rather than saying "I'm a citizen of the US." What that term is, I don't really mind too much. The American label has been around forever, and that is how I grew up identifying myself. It is also how the rest of the world identifies us.
It isn't arrogant either. Again, America is part of the name of our country. We didn't choose the name, but it is what it is. Rather than say "United States of America," most of us shorten it to the USA, the US, or America. I have no problems just using the US if people are offended by America, but I do not think that it is fair to call us arrogant for using America to identify the country when that is part of the country's name. I can tell you that I do not know a single person that uses America out of some twisted desire to put down every other country in both North and South America.
PBBN43 said:
|
I said it is in the name of the country.