By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
crissindahouse on 04 March 2012
Edit Thread
Mr Puggsly said:
IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Mr Puggsly said:
Marks said:


It just means I don't think homosexuality is natural and shouldn't be practiced by humans...but as I already said it's nobodies business who marries who. I'm kind of taking a Ron Paul stance on this. 

I agree its not natural in the sense its not what "God" intended. But neither is blowjobs, handjobs, or anything sex related that doesn't lead to procreation.

We are thrown into this world against are will and I say let people do whatever they want as long as it doesn't hurt anybody.


Oh, please... If there was a God then everything would be ending up just the way it's supposed to. Even some fucking animals (LOL) are gay, and they don't even have a free will. Did God make a mistake when creating these animals?

I put quotations on God so don't start an atheist argument with me.

I'm just saying by design gay sex wasn't probably was not intended. But frankly I don't care what people do as long as its consensual.

i posted it in the other thread and showed with that that i could easily say that this was exactly gods plan (if you believe in him)

i wrote there to someone:

"related to gay of the maternal side are more fertile did you know that? i could say maybe this does mean it's a plan from god to have more fertile woman? maybe guys related to lesbians are more fertile as well but i don't know about that... and do you know what this means as well? that, if a woman related to a gay is more fertile, that she isn't normal as well! she is more fertile like other woman because she is related to a gay so that isn't normal! i bet you would never say to your sister that it's not normal that she is so fertile because youruncle or so is gay, would you? no, you would say god was very good to her! i can't imagine you saying to your sister "you just got so many sweet babies because of our uncle"

scientist believe that this could mean the whole mankind will get more kids because of that than if we wouldn't have gay so the related to them wouldn't be as fertile as they are. gays means more kids on this planets crazy ha? wow and all those kids who are born because of that are totally unnatural even when they aren't gay then! maybe you are one of them?"

 

that was a study from 2004 in italy and if this is true it means that gayness on this planet helps humans to increase in population. and maybe the other creatures as well. maybe it would even help some creatures to stay alive on this planet.

and if you don't believe in god you would have to ask if darwin was wrong. with his logic only "things" which help creatures will stay and creatures will lose what they don't need. so if we believe in the evolutionary theory it makes no sense that there are still gay people on this planet if it doesn't help humans (which the italian study shows)

so i can look at it like i want i don't see that it's not natural taht some percent of creatures will be gay.

ok now we could talk about the appendix or so but gayness sould have never benn in creatures if it wouldn't make sense for them for anything.

 

and to say it's a lifestyle like using mask having sex is a joke right? to say to gay people that it's just their lifestyle to have sex with other gay people wtf?