happydolphin said:
It's not really about what forum dwellers want than what is considered a top-tier game. For example, the 3DS gets RE:R. That's top tier. Compare that to the Wii, which got Monster Hunter Tri (which is fantastic). But how much more of that happened, on the market leader's platform, not much. It's not a surprise, we really do know why, and HW is a factor, but there is so much more (and we've gone over it already you must remember). There was not a conspiracy, but a movement of Nintendo-doubt last gen, it's incontestable. Market Leader, gets no gamez. But, having said that, there were reasons, and times have thankfully changed or at least seem to change for now. People asking for Skyrim on Wii can't make up their minds. We're talking about top-tier effort you and I right, not necessarily next-gen requiring titles. The point is top-tier, not Skyrim. You know what I mean. |
oh yeah, Capcom was foul for that. You'll get no arguments from me on that. Skipping the Wii and giving a RE:R to 3DS instead is shady. Another thing is that Ninty and third parties really werent working with each other when it came to WII. It has to be a two way street, whether they are market leaders or not.
I just mentioned Skyrim because it is one of the games that I have seen requested. What was a top tier game?? What game would have Wii only owners want that they would consider top tier. Because IMHO, as soon as a gen starts and the more powerful hardware comes out top tier kind of changes







